π Language Intelligence
π Language Intelligence Providers (LIPs)
π Provider | π€ Model Families | π Docs | π Keys | π° Valuation | πΈ Revenue (2024) | π² Cost (1M Output) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Groq | Llama, DeepSeek, Gemini, Mistral | Docs | Keys | $2.8B | - | $0.79 |
Ollama | llama, mistral, mixtral, vicuna, gemma, qwen, deepseek, openchat, openhermes, codelama, codegemma, llava, minicpm, wizardcoder, wizardmath, meditrion, falcon | Docs | Keys | - | $3.2M | $0 |
OpenAI | o1, o1-mini, o4, o4-mini, gpt-4, gpt-4-turbo, gpt-4-omni | Docs | Keys | $300B | $3.7B | $8.00 |
XAI | Grok, Grok Vision | Docs | Keys | $80B | $100M | $15.00 |
Anthropic | Claude Sonnet, Claude Opus, Claude Haiku | Docs | Keys | $61.5B | $1B | $15.00 |
TogetherAI | Llama, Mistral, Mixtral, Qwen, Gemma, WizardLM, DBRX, DeepSeek, Hermes, SOLAR, StripedHyena | Docs | Keys | $3.3B | $50M | $0.90 |
Perplexity | Sonar, Sonar Deep Research | Docs | Keys | $18B | $20M | $15.00 |
Cloudflare | Llama, Gemma, Mistral, Phi, Qwen, DeepSeek, Hermes, SQL Coder, Code Llama | Docs | Keys | $62.3B | $1.67B | $2.25 |
Gemini | Docs | Keys | - | ~$400M | $10.00 |
π§ How Language Models Work
Language models learn from billions of text examples to
identify statistical patterns and structures across diverse sources, converting words into
high-dimensional vectorsβnumerical lists that capture meaning and relationships between concepts.
These mathematical representations allow models to understand that "king/queen" share properties
and "Paris/France" mirrors "Tokyo/Japan" through their transformer architecture, a neural network
backbone that processes information through multiple layers of analysis. The attention mechanism
enables the system to dynamically focus on relevant parts of input text when generating each word,
maintaining context like humans tracking conversation threads, while calculating probability scores
across the entire vocabulary for each word position based on processed context. Rather than retrieving
stored responses, models create novel text by selecting the most probable words given learned
patterns, maintaining coherence across long passages while adapting to specific prompt nuances
through deep pattern recognition.
Self-Attention: Each word creates three representations: Query (what it's looking for), Key (what
it offers), and Value (its actual content). For example, in "The cat sat on the mat," the word "cat"
has a Query vector that searches for actions, a Key vector that advertises itself as a subject, and
a Value vector containing its semantic meaning as an animal. The attention mechanism calculates how
much "cat" should focus on other words by comparing its Query with their Keys - finding high
similarity with "sat" (the action) - then combines the corresponding Value vectors to create a
contextualized representation where "cat" now understands it's the one doing the sitting.